PBXes (http://www1.pbxes.com/forum/index.php)
- English (http://www1.pbxes.com/forum/board.php?boardid=16)
-- Feature Requests (http://www1.pbxes.com/forum/board.php?boardid=23)
--- RE: Partial CID match for inbound routing (http://www1.pbxes.com/forum/threadid.php?threadid=1260)
Partial CID match for inbound routing
Just wondering if it's possible to do a partial CID match when using inbound routing? For example, I would like to have calls to a trunk from an area code to route to one menu while calls from another area code to another menu. Is this possible, or would it be too ambiguous for the system?
Thanks!
So what you are looking for, is wildcard matching in the "Caller ID Number" field of the Inbound Route.
Yup, that's right.
yea! that would be a nice feature!!
RE: Partial CID match for inbound routing
The use of wildcards for CIDs has been implemented.
Great addittion for Inbound routing flexibility.
Square brackets in the Caller ID Number result in a "Invalid Characters" error message.
Ex. 222[34]xxxxxx results in the above error.
RE: Partial CID match for inbound routing
Thanks for your comment. It is fixed.
RE: Partial CID match for inbound routing
I used "x" in inbound routing rules and it is not working.
Recently I received many spam calls for my USA number. They all came from 360 area code but with different CIDs, so I decided to blaock all CIDs starting with 360 or 1360. I setup inbound rules to set all calls with CID "360xxxxxxx" or "1360xxxxxxx" to "Hung Up", but spam calls still got through. Also "303" area code. I Googled these spam numbers and can see these spam calls make people mad.
Any thoughts to block them?
RE: Partial CID match for inbound routing
When using several inbound routes, some with caller ID and some with trunk name, those with trunk name will take priority.
So you have to add trunk name to those with caller ID, to make them go first.
Powered by: Burning Board Lite 1.0.2 © 2001-2004 WoltLab GmbH
English translation by Satelk